| package fake |
| |
| import ( |
| "context" |
| "fmt" |
| "time" |
| |
| "github.com/iomodo/staff/llm" |
| ) |
| |
| // FakeProvider implements a fake LLM provider for testing |
| type FakeProvider struct { |
| responses []string |
| index int |
| } |
| |
| // NewFakeProvider creates a new fake provider with predefined responses |
| func NewFakeProvider() *FakeProvider { |
| responses := []string{ |
| `## Task Solution |
| |
| I've analyzed the task requirements and here's my proposed solution: |
| |
| ### Implementation Plan |
| 1. Create the necessary data structures |
| 2. Implement the core business logic |
| 3. Add proper error handling |
| 4. Write comprehensive tests |
| 5. Update documentation |
| |
| ### Code Changes |
| - Add new functions to handle the requirements |
| - Update existing modules for compatibility |
| - Implement proper validation |
| - Add logging for debugging |
| |
| ### Testing Strategy |
| - Unit tests for all new functions |
| - Integration tests for the workflow |
| - Performance tests for scalability |
| - Edge case validation |
| |
| ### Files to Create/Modify |
| - src/main.go - Core implementation |
| - src/handlers.go - Request handlers |
| - src/models.go - Data models |
| - tests/ - Test files |
| - docs/ - Documentation updates |
| |
| ### Dependencies |
| No new external dependencies required. |
| |
| ### Deployment Notes |
| - Backward compatible changes |
| - No database migrations needed |
| - Can be deployed incrementally |
| |
| This solution addresses all the requirements while maintaining code quality and system stability.`, |
| |
| `## Comprehensive Task Analysis |
| |
| After careful consideration, I recommend the following approach: |
| |
| ### Technical Architecture |
| - **Backend**: Implement using existing Go patterns |
| - **Database**: Utilize current PostgreSQL setup |
| - **API**: RESTful endpoints with proper versioning |
| - **Security**: OAuth2 authentication with JWT tokens |
| |
| ### Development Steps |
| 1. **Phase 1**: Core functionality implementation |
| 2. **Phase 2**: User interface development |
| 3. **Phase 3**: Testing and optimization |
| 4. **Phase 4**: Documentation and deployment |
| |
| ### Risk Assessment |
| - **Low Risk**: Well-defined requirements |
| - **Medium Risk**: Timeline constraints |
| - **Mitigation**: Incremental development approach |
| |
| ### Resource Requirements |
| - Development time: 2-3 weeks |
| - Testing phase: 1 week |
| - Documentation: 2-3 days |
| |
| ### Success Metrics |
| - Performance benchmarks met |
| - All test cases passing |
| - User acceptance criteria satisfied |
| - Code coverage > 90% |
| |
| This solution provides a robust foundation for future enhancements while meeting immediate business needs.`, |
| |
| `## Strategic Implementation Proposal |
| |
| ### Executive Summary |
| This task requires a comprehensive solution that balances technical excellence with business objectives. |
| |
| ### Solution Overview |
| - **Approach**: Agile development methodology |
| - **Technology Stack**: Current tech stack enhancement |
| - **Timeline**: 3-4 week delivery cycle |
| - **Team**: Cross-functional collaboration |
| |
| ### Technical Specifications |
| - Clean architecture principles |
| - Microservices design patterns |
| - Event-driven communication |
| - Comprehensive monitoring and logging |
| |
| ### Implementation Details |
| 1. **Requirements Analysis**: Complete stakeholder alignment |
| 2. **System Design**: Scalable and maintainable architecture |
| 3. **Development**: Test-driven development approach |
| 4. **Quality Assurance**: Automated testing pipeline |
| 5. **Deployment**: Blue-green deployment strategy |
| |
| ### Business Impact |
| - Improved user experience |
| - Enhanced system reliability |
| - Reduced operational overhead |
| - Increased development velocity |
| |
| ### Next Steps |
| 1. Stakeholder review and approval |
| 2. Resource allocation confirmation |
| 3. Development sprint planning |
| 4. Implementation kickoff |
| |
| This solution ensures long-term success while delivering immediate value to the organization.`, |
| } |
| |
| return &FakeProvider{ |
| responses: responses, |
| index: 0, |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // ChatCompletion implements the LLM interface |
| func (f *FakeProvider) ChatCompletion(ctx context.Context, req llm.ChatCompletionRequest) (*llm.ChatCompletionResponse, error) { |
| // Simulate API delay |
| time.Sleep(500 * time.Millisecond) |
| |
| // Get the next response (cycle through responses) |
| response := f.responses[f.index%len(f.responses)] |
| f.index++ |
| |
| return &llm.ChatCompletionResponse{ |
| ID: fmt.Sprintf("fake-response-%d", f.index), |
| Object: "chat.completion", |
| Created: time.Now().Unix(), |
| Model: req.Model, |
| Choices: []llm.ChatCompletionChoice{ |
| { |
| Index: 0, |
| Message: llm.Message{ |
| Role: llm.RoleAssistant, |
| Content: response, |
| }, |
| FinishReason: "stop", |
| }, |
| }, |
| Usage: llm.Usage{ |
| PromptTokens: 100, |
| CompletionTokens: 300, |
| TotalTokens: 400, |
| }, |
| }, nil |
| } |
| |
| // CreateEmbeddings implements the LLM interface (not used in current implementation) |
| func (f *FakeProvider) CreateEmbeddings(ctx context.Context, req llm.EmbeddingRequest) (*llm.EmbeddingResponse, error) { |
| return &llm.EmbeddingResponse{ |
| Object: "list", |
| Data: []llm.Embedding{ |
| { |
| Object: "embedding", |
| Index: 0, |
| Embedding: make([]float64, 1536), // OpenAI embedding size |
| }, |
| }, |
| Model: req.Model, |
| Usage: llm.Usage{ |
| PromptTokens: 50, |
| TotalTokens: 50, |
| }, |
| }, nil |
| } |
| |
| // Close implements the LLM interface |
| func (f *FakeProvider) Close() error { |
| // Nothing to close for fake provider |
| return nil |
| } |