| iomodo | f1ddefe | 2025-07-28 09:02:05 +0400 | [diff] [blame^] | 1 | package fake |
| 2 | |
| 3 | import ( |
| 4 | "context" |
| 5 | "fmt" |
| 6 | "time" |
| 7 | |
| 8 | "github.com/iomodo/staff/llm" |
| 9 | ) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | // FakeProvider implements a fake LLM provider for testing |
| 12 | type FakeProvider struct { |
| 13 | responses []string |
| 14 | index int |
| 15 | } |
| 16 | |
| 17 | // NewFakeProvider creates a new fake provider with predefined responses |
| 18 | func NewFakeProvider() *FakeProvider { |
| 19 | responses := []string{ |
| 20 | `## Task Solution |
| 21 | |
| 22 | I've analyzed the task requirements and here's my proposed solution: |
| 23 | |
| 24 | ### Implementation Plan |
| 25 | 1. Create the necessary data structures |
| 26 | 2. Implement the core business logic |
| 27 | 3. Add proper error handling |
| 28 | 4. Write comprehensive tests |
| 29 | 5. Update documentation |
| 30 | |
| 31 | ### Code Changes |
| 32 | - Add new functions to handle the requirements |
| 33 | - Update existing modules for compatibility |
| 34 | - Implement proper validation |
| 35 | - Add logging for debugging |
| 36 | |
| 37 | ### Testing Strategy |
| 38 | - Unit tests for all new functions |
| 39 | - Integration tests for the workflow |
| 40 | - Performance tests for scalability |
| 41 | - Edge case validation |
| 42 | |
| 43 | ### Files to Create/Modify |
| 44 | - src/main.go - Core implementation |
| 45 | - src/handlers.go - Request handlers |
| 46 | - src/models.go - Data models |
| 47 | - tests/ - Test files |
| 48 | - docs/ - Documentation updates |
| 49 | |
| 50 | ### Dependencies |
| 51 | No new external dependencies required. |
| 52 | |
| 53 | ### Deployment Notes |
| 54 | - Backward compatible changes |
| 55 | - No database migrations needed |
| 56 | - Can be deployed incrementally |
| 57 | |
| 58 | This solution addresses all the requirements while maintaining code quality and system stability.`, |
| 59 | |
| 60 | `## Comprehensive Task Analysis |
| 61 | |
| 62 | After careful consideration, I recommend the following approach: |
| 63 | |
| 64 | ### Technical Architecture |
| 65 | - **Backend**: Implement using existing Go patterns |
| 66 | - **Database**: Utilize current PostgreSQL setup |
| 67 | - **API**: RESTful endpoints with proper versioning |
| 68 | - **Security**: OAuth2 authentication with JWT tokens |
| 69 | |
| 70 | ### Development Steps |
| 71 | 1. **Phase 1**: Core functionality implementation |
| 72 | 2. **Phase 2**: User interface development |
| 73 | 3. **Phase 3**: Testing and optimization |
| 74 | 4. **Phase 4**: Documentation and deployment |
| 75 | |
| 76 | ### Risk Assessment |
| 77 | - **Low Risk**: Well-defined requirements |
| 78 | - **Medium Risk**: Timeline constraints |
| 79 | - **Mitigation**: Incremental development approach |
| 80 | |
| 81 | ### Resource Requirements |
| 82 | - Development time: 2-3 weeks |
| 83 | - Testing phase: 1 week |
| 84 | - Documentation: 2-3 days |
| 85 | |
| 86 | ### Success Metrics |
| 87 | - Performance benchmarks met |
| 88 | - All test cases passing |
| 89 | - User acceptance criteria satisfied |
| 90 | - Code coverage > 90% |
| 91 | |
| 92 | This solution provides a robust foundation for future enhancements while meeting immediate business needs.`, |
| 93 | |
| 94 | `## Strategic Implementation Proposal |
| 95 | |
| 96 | ### Executive Summary |
| 97 | This task requires a comprehensive solution that balances technical excellence with business objectives. |
| 98 | |
| 99 | ### Solution Overview |
| 100 | - **Approach**: Agile development methodology |
| 101 | - **Technology Stack**: Current tech stack enhancement |
| 102 | - **Timeline**: 3-4 week delivery cycle |
| 103 | - **Team**: Cross-functional collaboration |
| 104 | |
| 105 | ### Technical Specifications |
| 106 | - Clean architecture principles |
| 107 | - Microservices design patterns |
| 108 | - Event-driven communication |
| 109 | - Comprehensive monitoring and logging |
| 110 | |
| 111 | ### Implementation Details |
| 112 | 1. **Requirements Analysis**: Complete stakeholder alignment |
| 113 | 2. **System Design**: Scalable and maintainable architecture |
| 114 | 3. **Development**: Test-driven development approach |
| 115 | 4. **Quality Assurance**: Automated testing pipeline |
| 116 | 5. **Deployment**: Blue-green deployment strategy |
| 117 | |
| 118 | ### Business Impact |
| 119 | - Improved user experience |
| 120 | - Enhanced system reliability |
| 121 | - Reduced operational overhead |
| 122 | - Increased development velocity |
| 123 | |
| 124 | ### Next Steps |
| 125 | 1. Stakeholder review and approval |
| 126 | 2. Resource allocation confirmation |
| 127 | 3. Development sprint planning |
| 128 | 4. Implementation kickoff |
| 129 | |
| 130 | This solution ensures long-term success while delivering immediate value to the organization.`, |
| 131 | } |
| 132 | |
| 133 | return &FakeProvider{ |
| 134 | responses: responses, |
| 135 | index: 0, |
| 136 | } |
| 137 | } |
| 138 | |
| 139 | // ChatCompletion implements the LLM interface |
| 140 | func (f *FakeProvider) ChatCompletion(ctx context.Context, req llm.ChatCompletionRequest) (*llm.ChatCompletionResponse, error) { |
| 141 | // Simulate API delay |
| 142 | time.Sleep(500 * time.Millisecond) |
| 143 | |
| 144 | // Get the next response (cycle through responses) |
| 145 | response := f.responses[f.index%len(f.responses)] |
| 146 | f.index++ |
| 147 | |
| 148 | return &llm.ChatCompletionResponse{ |
| 149 | ID: fmt.Sprintf("fake-response-%d", f.index), |
| 150 | Object: "chat.completion", |
| 151 | Created: time.Now().Unix(), |
| 152 | Model: req.Model, |
| 153 | Choices: []llm.ChatCompletionChoice{ |
| 154 | { |
| 155 | Index: 0, |
| 156 | Message: llm.Message{ |
| 157 | Role: llm.RoleAssistant, |
| 158 | Content: response, |
| 159 | }, |
| 160 | FinishReason: "stop", |
| 161 | }, |
| 162 | }, |
| 163 | Usage: llm.Usage{ |
| 164 | PromptTokens: 100, |
| 165 | CompletionTokens: 300, |
| 166 | TotalTokens: 400, |
| 167 | }, |
| 168 | }, nil |
| 169 | } |
| 170 | |
| 171 | // CreateEmbeddings implements the LLM interface (not used in current implementation) |
| 172 | func (f *FakeProvider) CreateEmbeddings(ctx context.Context, req llm.EmbeddingRequest) (*llm.EmbeddingResponse, error) { |
| 173 | return &llm.EmbeddingResponse{ |
| 174 | Object: "list", |
| 175 | Data: []llm.Embedding{ |
| 176 | { |
| 177 | Object: "embedding", |
| 178 | Index: 0, |
| 179 | Embedding: make([]float64, 1536), // OpenAI embedding size |
| 180 | }, |
| 181 | }, |
| 182 | Model: req.Model, |
| 183 | Usage: llm.Usage{ |
| 184 | PromptTokens: 50, |
| 185 | TotalTokens: 50, |
| 186 | }, |
| 187 | }, nil |
| 188 | } |
| 189 | |
| 190 | // Close implements the LLM interface |
| 191 | func (f *FakeProvider) Close() error { |
| 192 | // Nothing to close for fake provider |
| 193 | return nil |
| 194 | } |